Crossings protected by traffic signals.

NathanFromEngland · Post by **NathanFromEngland** » Wed May 30, 2018 5:37 pm

Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en

Post by **ToledoRailfan** » Wed May 30, 2018 6:01 pm

NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en

Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.

NathanFromEngland · Post by **NathanFromEngland** » Thu May 31, 2018 2:54 am

ToledoRailfan wrote:
NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.

I should've mentioned the spur
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6564221 ... 6656?hl=en

Post by **ToledoRailfan** » Thu May 31, 2018 6:15 am

NathanFromEngland wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:
NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.
I should've mentioned the spur
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6564221 ... 6656?hl=en

I still wouldn't say that is appropriate for this thread as those traffic signals aren't there for the crossing. Whether or not a crossing like that is considered passive or not could be up for debate though. There is a similar situation at this crossing on a heritage line in Tecumseh, Michigan.
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0040186 ... 6656?hl=en

I'm not 100% sure on this but I don't think that traffic signals at intersections with crossings are required by federal law to change to a certain phase when there is a train, although the one you posted was of coarse from Canada.

YouTube · Post by **freebrickproductions** » Thu May 31, 2018 12:28 pm

I'm pretty sure they are, or at least it's recommended that they are.

LARDLOGO · Post by **LARDLOGO** » Sat Jun 16, 2018 1:17 am

Out of service crossing in Vermont.
https://goo.gl/maps/w2soj8Tf8Rq
https://goo.gl/maps/4bx6Fw814dx
https://goo.gl/maps/U6qAWuErMGA2

ZachL · Post by **ZachL** » Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:57 pm

LARDLOGO wrote:Out of service crossing in Vermont.
https://goo.gl/maps/w2soj8Tf8Rq
https://goo.gl/maps/4bx6Fw814dx
https://goo.gl/maps/U6qAWuErMGA2

Those were not protected by traffic signals! The signals were for the intersection.

NathanFromEngland · Post by **NathanFromEngland** » Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:14 pm

Prineville, Oregon (No longer there)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@44.30920 ... 328!8i1664

ZachL · Post by **ZachL** » Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:37 pm

NathanFromEngland wrote:Prineville, Oregon (No longer there)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@44.30920 ... 328!8i1664

Looks like those are just beacons and not full traffic signals.

NathanFromEngland · Post by **NathanFromEngland** » Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:41 am

Thessaloniki, Decentralized Administration of Macedonia and Thrace
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.6401775 ... 312!8i6656

Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.

Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.