CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Can't have signals without railroads, so talk about your favorite locomotives, railroads and any other (non signal) railroad related stuff.

Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, TommyBNSF, Raco_GS

User avatar
NathanFromEngland
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:52 pm
Location: Merseyside

CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by NathanFromEngland » Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:27 pm

While typing up the locomotive numbers on this video i made, i noticed when i typed one of the numbers in, it was a IC locomotive, but with the CN paint scheme. RRPictureArchives classifies it a IC locomotive, but there is no IC paint! :Confused:

Can somebody explain?


(It's the second locomotive in trail, CN 2465)
User avatar
ToledoRailfan
No Longer Associated With The Forum
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:38 pm

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by ToledoRailfan » Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:33 pm

Illinois Central is a subsidiary of Canadian National and it is considered a paper company (company only on paper), just like the Grand Truck Western and the Wisconsin Central, and the SOO Line with Canadian Pacific.
User avatar
ZachL
Posts: 3029
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:04 pm
Location: Hillsborough County/Tampa, FL

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by ZachL » Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:46 pm

I could have sworn we've discussed this recently, no?
Crossing pictures from Plant City, FL are finally here! viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2538
User avatar
ToledoRailfan
No Longer Associated With The Forum
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:38 pm

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by ToledoRailfan » Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:59 pm

I thought so too. I just now tried searching via our search bar but I couldn't find anything related to this in particular.
User avatar
freebrickproductions
Posts: 8480
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by freebrickproductions » Fri Apr 06, 2018 12:40 am

The CN and IC merged years ago (which is why CN has lines all the way down to Louisiana and Mobile, AL), but it appears that CN likes to use the IC and GTW reporting marks to add extra roster space to their railroad.
They/Them for me, please.

Click here if you want to submit crossing photos to the site!

Avatar by runesprite on Twitter.
User avatar
ToledoRailfan
No Longer Associated With The Forum
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:38 pm

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by ToledoRailfan » Fri Apr 06, 2018 12:47 am

freebrickproductions wrote:but it appears that CN likes to use the IC and GTW reporting marks to add extra roster space to their railroad.
I think that might have something to do with CN wanting to identify the locomotives used by their individual subsidiaries.
User avatar
freebrickproductions
Posts: 8480
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by freebrickproductions » Fri Apr 06, 2018 1:05 am

ToledoRailfan wrote:
freebrickproductions wrote:but it appears that CN likes to use the IC and GTW reporting marks to add extra roster space to their railroad.
I think that might have something to do with CN wanting to identify the locomotives used by their individual subsidiaries.
Probably, but I do know that UP uses UPY reporting marks on some of their engines (especially smaller ones used on locals and in yards).
They/Them for me, please.

Click here if you want to submit crossing photos to the site!

Avatar by runesprite on Twitter.
User avatar
Erik-Gorb-Hamilton
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:25 am

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by Erik-Gorb-Hamilton » Fri Apr 06, 2018 3:16 am

The BNSF does the same thing, however I have only seen them use the old GN reporting mark for old engines that are usually stored or off the roster.
Continuing my
Grandfathers
Legacy


CEO of the Stratford Gap Railway
User avatar
freebrickproductions
Posts: 8480
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by freebrickproductions » Fri Apr 06, 2018 12:12 pm

Erik-Gorb-Hamilton wrote:The BNSF does the same thing, however I have only seen them use the old GN reporting mark for old engines that are usually stored or off the roster.
I've also seen a few BNSF engines with a "BN" logo on the side (as in a partial BNSF swoosh with only the first two letters).
They/Them for me, please.

Click here if you want to submit crossing photos to the site!

Avatar by runesprite on Twitter.
User avatar
TheSignalMan2000
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:46 am
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: CN locomotive, but owned by IC?

Post by TheSignalMan2000 » Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:29 pm

freebrickproductions wrote:The CN and IC merged years ago (which is why CN has lines all the way down to Louisiana and Mobile, AL), but it appears that CN likes to use the IC and GTW reporting marks to add extra roster space to their railroad.
Some of the CN rail lines that I have taken, they all say "Illinois Central" on the relay cases, and in fact, one of the crossings I filmed also had 2 Illinois Central locomotives as well shown below:
ImageImageImage
The crossing photographer of Louisiana, Mississippi, & East Texas


My YouTube account: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSignalman2000/
My Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/158425094@N07/
Post Reply