TrickyMario7654 wrote:Bump! I found this video of a signal maintainer replacing a WCH M-bell with an e-Bell. Also note how he just throws the old bell on the ground.
It said in the description that the maintainer was in a real pissy mood that day. That might explain the chucking.
Pissy mood or not, I wouldn't have condoned that action at all. The bell could have very much been salvaged and there would have been no problem for the person who was there asking for it to take it either, especially since it seemed like the maintainer (or even the railroad) had no intention on re-purposing it, too.
Re: Bell Maintenance and Replacement
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:17 pm
by cabman701
ZachL wrote:
LARDLOGO wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:Bump! I found this video of a signal maintainer replacing a WCH M-bell with an e-Bell. Also note how he just throws the old bell on the ground.
It said in the description that the maintainer was in a real pissy mood that day. That might explain the chucking.
Pissy mood or not, I wouldn't have condoned that action at all. The bell could have very much been salvaged and there would have been no problem for the person who was there asking for it to take it either, especially since it seemed like the maintainer (or even the railroad) had no intention on re-purposing it, too.
Pissy mood aside, keep in mind depending on what railroad it is... does the maintainer have the authority to just give something away like that? It is still railroad property whether it is working or not. He may have rules he has to follow.
Re: Bell Maintenance and Replacement
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:04 am
by LARDLOGO
cabman701 wrote:
ZachL wrote:
LARDLOGO wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:Bump! I found this video of a signal maintainer replacing a WCH M-bell with an e-Bell. Also note how he just throws the old bell on the ground.
It said in the description that the maintainer was in a real pissy mood that day. That might explain the chucking.
Pissy mood or not, I wouldn't have condoned that action at all. The bell could have very much been salvaged and there would have been no problem for the person who was there asking for it to take it either, especially since it seemed like the maintainer (or even the railroad) had no intention on re-purposing it, too.
Pissy mood aside, keep in mind depending on what railroad it is... does the maintainer have the authority to just give something away like that? It is still railroad property whether it is working or not. He may have rules he has to follow.
Both arguments are true....
Re: Bell Maintenance and Replacement
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:19 pm
by ZachL
nickrink wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:Bump! I found this video of a signal maintainer replacing a WCH M-bell with an e-Bell. Also note how he just throws the old bell on the ground.
Why couldn't the signal maintainer just give the bell to the guy?!?!? It makes me so mad when he throws it on the ground! And the sound it makes! And when he asked the signal maintainer what he was going to do with it and he said he was going to throw it away made me so mad!!!! And how he won't give the bell to the guy, what else was the signal maintainer going to do with it?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
It's already been answered...he may have been told he can't do that.
Re: Bell Maintenance and Replacement
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 11:52 am
by PlyingKibbles89
On my vacation to California, I was able to see a guy replace a US&S electronic bell with a Safetran type 3. He didn't throw it to the ground, instead he tied some rope around the bell, and he lowered the bell, safely. Of course, the bell wasn't dead, as the new bell didn't work, either. The whole signal needs to be replaced! I was able to acquire the bell, at least!
And the sound it makes! 
And when he asked the signal maintainer what he was going to do with it and he said he was going to throw it away made me so mad!!!!