Re: Locations of Currently Known or Existing GRS Lex-C Light
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:37 pm
https://www.rxrsignals.com/Phpbb3/
Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
Wow!ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
It's not actually permanent, thankfully.ToledoRailfan wrote:Wow!ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656I wonder if they are in permanent flash. I would think that the other street would have the lights flashing amber. I wonder what would happen if a train came while they were in flash mode.
Well that is a first for me!ZachL wrote:It's not actually permanent, thankfully.ToledoRailfan wrote:Wow!ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656I wonder if they are in permanent flash. I would think that the other street would have the lights flashing amber. I wonder what would happen if a train came while they were in flash mode.
By the way, I surely hope this never fell down and is actually fixed by now.![]()
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4194534 ... 312!8i6656

Maybe he was coming to investigate why?ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
Still doesn't explain why Detroit has so many traffic signal problems.cabman701 wrote:Maybe he was coming to investigate why?ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191462 ... 312!8i6656
Absolutely no money, that's why. You used to be able to find tons of abandoned signals around the city where they had been downgraded to stop signs, but the signals were never removed.ZachL wrote:Still doesn't explain why Detroit has so many traffic signal problems.cabman701 wrote:Maybe he was coming to investigate why?ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191462 ... 312!8i6656
Their street light problem is pretty terrible too, if you've ever heard about that.freebrickproductions wrote:Absolutely no money, that's why. You used to be able to find tons of abandoned signals around the city where they had been downgraded to stop signs, but the signals were never removed.ZachL wrote:Still doesn't explain why Detroit has so many traffic signal problems.cabman701 wrote:Maybe he was coming to investigate why?ZachL wrote:Interestingly, the signal there is in a flash cycle. I've never seen so many traffic signals in a flash cycle on GSV to that extent except for in Detroit!freebrickproductions wrote:Detroit, MI:
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191428 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4191462 ... 312!8i6656