Page 6 of 179

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:29 am
by ToledoRailfan
I wonder why the signals and gates are so far from the bridge? https://www.google.com/maps/@45.9789777 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.9791807 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.9817447 ... 6656?hl=en
----------------------
Here are some old signals with worded pedestrian signals! https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4703324 ... 6656?hl=en https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4694192 ... 6656?hl=en
----------------------
Here are some cool foggy views of Cheboygan, Michigan. https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6448524 ... 6656?hl=en https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6448524 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.645189, ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6457241 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6457241 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.645959, ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6462156 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6466061 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6467988 ... 6656?hl=en
----------------------
Here is a bridge that is protected by one red signal beacon on one side and one RYG signal that is not lit on the other side. (t seems kind of like a sketchy setup, although the gates look pretty good. I really hope the RYG signal's green light is just burnt out.
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2479725 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2487711 ... 6656?hl=en

Here is a photograph of the RYG signal that I took in late July of 2015.
Image

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:08 am
by freebrickproductions
ToledoRailfan wrote: Here is a bridge that is protected by one red signal beacon on one side and one RYG signal that is not lit on the other side. (t seems kind of like a sketchy setup, although the gates look pretty good. I really hope the RYG signal's green light is just burnt out.
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2479725 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2487711 ... 6656?hl=en

Here is a photograph of the RYG signal that I took in late July of 2015.
Image
7 inch gate lights there! Nice!

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:06 am
by ToledoRailfan
freebrickproductions wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote: Here is a bridge that is protected by one red signal beacon on one side and one RYG signal that is not lit on the other side. (t seems kind of like a sketchy setup, although the gates look pretty good. I really hope the RYG signal's green light is just burnt out.
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2479725 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.2487711 ... 6656?hl=en

Here is a photograph of the RYG signal that I took in late July of 2015.
Image
7 inch gate lights there! Nice!
I wonder if 7 inch gate lights are just as uncommon on movable bridge gates as they are on railroad crossings. It might because hard to know though sense movable bridges use a variety of gate types.

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 11:50 pm
by ToledoRailfan
Birds have made a nest in this traffic signal! https://www.google.com/maps/@27.1244956 ... 6656?hl=en
------------------------------------
Ominous looking clouds. https://www.google.com/maps/@51.8292432 ... 6656?hl=en https://www.google.com/maps/@51.8292432 ... 6656?hl=en

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:46 pm
by ToledoRailfan
Kind of an odd way to have a protected green turn. Still pretty cool old signals though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.3570095 ... 6656?hl=en

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:02 pm
by ZachL
ToledoRailfan wrote:Kind of an odd way to have a protected green turn. Still pretty cool old signals though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.3570095 ... 6656?hl=en
What in the...? Ain't that some sort of conflict there. :Blink:

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:38 pm
by freebrickproductions
ZachL wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Kind of an odd way to have a protected green turn. Still pretty cool old signals though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.3570095 ... 6656?hl=en
What in the...? Ain't that some sort of conflict there. :Blink:
Reds aren't usually monitored by conflict monitors on older controllers, so the intersection wouldn't be dropped into flash.
Pennsylvania did this a lot in the past. The red ball indications basically mean that through traffic can't go, but the green arrows mean that you can turn right without having to stop, IIRC. It's basically like these doghouse signals here, only without having the yellow and green ball indications (though the one on the right had all green and yellow arrows with no ball indications other than the red):
ImageSiemens Traffic Lights by freebrickproductions, on Flickr
Not entirely sure on that though. I'll ask someone who know a bit more about the signals in ToledoRailfan's post and see what they say.
EDIT: Yep, I am correct.

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 11:27 pm
by ZachL
freebrickproductions wrote:
ZachL wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Kind of an odd way to have a protected green turn. Still pretty cool old signals though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.3570095 ... 6656?hl=en
What in the...? Ain't that some sort of conflict there. :Blink:
Reds aren't usually monitored by conflict monitors on older controllers, so the intersection wouldn't be dropped into flash.
Pennsylvania did this a lot in the past. The red ball indications basically mean that through traffic can't go, but the green arrows mean that you can turn right without having to stop, IIRC. It's basically like these doghouse signals here, only without having the yellow and green ball indications (though the one on the right had all green and yellow arrows with no ball indications other than the red):
ImageSiemens Traffic Lights by freebrickproductions, on Flickr
Not entirely sure on that though. I'll ask someone who know a bit more about the signals in ToledoRailfan's post and see what they say.
EDIT: Yep, I am correct.
What I don't understand though is why the red and green were active, yet there was no going straight and you could only turn right.

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:23 am
by freebrickproductions
ZachL wrote:
freebrickproductions wrote:
ZachL wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Kind of an odd way to have a protected green turn. Still pretty cool old signals though.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.3570095 ... 6656?hl=en
What in the...? Ain't that some sort of conflict there. :Blink:
Reds aren't usually monitored by conflict monitors on older controllers, so the intersection wouldn't be dropped into flash.
Pennsylvania did this a lot in the past. The red ball indications basically mean that through traffic can't go, but the green arrows mean that you can turn right without having to stop, IIRC. It's basically like these doghouse signals here, only without having the yellow and green ball indications (though the one on the right had all green and yellow arrows with no ball indications other than the red):
ImageSiemens Traffic Lights by freebrickproductions, on Flickr
Not entirely sure on that though. I'll ask someone who know a bit more about the signals in ToledoRailfan's post and see what they say.
EDIT: Yep, I am correct.
What I don't understand though is why the red and green were active, yet there was no going straight and you could only turn right.
Maybe it was the standard configuration for protected right turn signals at the time in that region.

Re: Google Street View

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:44 pm
by ToledoRailfan
Kind of an interesting way of having a traffic signal advanced warning sign with flashing amber lights. Appears they just got a regular traffic signal head.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8432469 ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.8434908 ... 6656?hl=en
-----------------------
Here is a pretty cool railroad bridge in a scenic area!
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.7308131 ... 6656?hl=en
-----------------------
Kind of an odd lone signal.
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.30967,- ... 6656?hl=en