Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Talk about signals ranging from wigwags to EVA signals here.

Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, PlyingKibbles89, Raco_GS, Hopen111, TommyBNSF

User avatar
TrickyMario7654
Posts: 1360
kuchnie-na-wymiar.wroclaw.pl
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by TrickyMario7654 »

McK&H.Aust wrote:Nice pictures. I actually like this crossing, and I don't mind the new gate mechs because the original lights and wishbone gates still give the crossing a classic look. I don't mind the shape of the Safetran mechs, throw a coat of paint on them and it makes them look a bit older, but the one thing that really looks out of place is the e-bells :No1:

It actually reminds me of the crossing at Junee with the picket fences, except this one has been ruined by crappy e-bells. Why can't they leave things alone :Curse1:
Yeah, I quite like the fencing here, and did remind me of the Junee crossing. I wish they would stop replacing the old bells just in the name of progress. :TDOWN:

Here's a cab view of the line between Middle Brighton and Sandringham's stations shot in 2010. You can see that only one crossing had E-Bells.
User avatar
TrickyMario7654
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by TrickyMario7654 »

I just read up in the Pakenham Gazette that three more crossings on the Puffing Billy line is to be upgraded with boom gates, apart of the Victorian government’s $50 million 'Safer Country Crossings Program'.
http://pakenham.starcommunity.com.au/ga ... illy-line/

Here's the crossings in question, the first one being Old Monbulk Road, Belgrave.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.906 ... 6656?hl=en

The second one is Edenmont Road, Clematis.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.929 ... 1664?hl=en

The third and finial crossing is Pinnocks Road, Emerald.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.930 ... 6656?hl=en

So that's three more Teardrop bells soon to be history. :Awww:
User avatar
McK&H.Aust
Posts: 926
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:16 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by McK&H.Aust »

TrickyMario7654 wrote:I just read up in the Pakenham Gazette that three more crossings on the Puffing Billy line is to be upgraded with boom gates, apart of the Victorian government’s $50 million 'Safer Country Crossings Program'.
http://pakenham.starcommunity.com.au/ga ... illy-line/

Here's the crossings in question, the first one being Old Monbulk Road, Belgrave.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.906 ... 6656?hl=en

The second one is Edenmont Road, Clematis.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.929 ... 1664?hl=en

The third and finial crossing is Pinnocks Road, Emerald.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.930 ... 6656?hl=en

So that's three more Teardrop bells soon to be history. :Awww:
That's a shame, I think it will look very out of place to have brand new gates with e-bells on a heritage railway. It would be nice if they could get some old gate mechs from the LXRA (either WRRS or McK&H) and use them, and they could re-use the teardrops from the old crossings. That way they would be preserving some of the old equipment from crossings that were being removed, I think it would fit in nicely with the heritage status of the railway.
User avatar
freebrickproductions
Posts: 9377
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by freebrickproductions »

McK&H.Aust wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:I just read up in the Pakenham Gazette that three more crossings on the Puffing Billy line is to be upgraded with boom gates, apart of the Victorian government’s $50 million 'Safer Country Crossings Program'.
http://pakenham.starcommunity.com.au/ga ... illy-line/

Here's the crossings in question, the first one being Old Monbulk Road, Belgrave.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.906 ... 6656?hl=en

The second one is Edenmont Road, Clematis.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.929 ... 1664?hl=en

The third and finial crossing is Pinnocks Road, Emerald.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.930 ... 6656?hl=en

So that's three more Teardrop bells soon to be history. :Awww:
That's a shame, I think it will look very out of place to have brand new gates with e-bells on a heritage railway. It would be nice if they could get some old gate mechs from the LXRA (either WRRS or McK&H) and use them, and they could re-use the teardrops from the old crossings. That way they would be preserving some of the old equipment from crossings that were being removed, I think it would fit in nicely with the heritage status of the railway.
Since they're a heritage railway, I can see them finding a way to re-use the equipment from the old signals, whether it be at crossings that don't currently have signals or re-using the equipment on new signals. I can also see them installing the gates on a separate mast, a la L&N, though the L&N did that as a standard new install rather than adding gates to pre-existing gateless signals. However, I have seen crossings where CSX kept at least one of the pre-existing gateless cantilever signals when they upgraded the crossing(s) to have gates. For example, at this crossing in Tullahoma, TN it appears that when CSX decided to install gates here, they kept the old gateless MI cantilevers that were here before the gates were installed, and just installed the gate mechanisms on short masts in front of them:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.3610527 ... authuser=0
And nearby in Estill Springs, TN, this crossing was gateless with a pair of Modern Industries cantilevers back in 2008:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.291943, ... authuser=0
However, after an accident between a train and a car in 2008, CSX upgraded the crossing with gates, but it appears that they kept the old Modern Industries cantilever on the left:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.2918289 ... authuser=0

Also, in the UK, Network Rail has recently been upgrading existing AOCL (gateless) crossings to AOCL+B crossings by just simply adding gates to the existing signals.
They/Them for me, please.

Click here if you want to submit crossing photos to the site!

Avatar by runesprite on Twitter.
User avatar
TrickyMario7654
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by TrickyMario7654 »

McK&H.Aust wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:I just read up in the Pakenham Gazette that three more crossings on the Puffing Billy line is to be upgraded with boom gates, apart of the Victorian government’s $50 million 'Safer Country Crossings Program'.
http://pakenham.starcommunity.com.au/ga ... illy-line/

Here's the crossings in question, the first one being Old Monbulk Road, Belgrave.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.906 ... 6656?hl=en

The second one is Edenmont Road, Clematis.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.929 ... 1664?hl=en

The third and finial crossing is Pinnocks Road, Emerald.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.930 ... 6656?hl=en

So that's three more Teardrop bells soon to be history. :Awww:
That's a shame, I think it will look very out of place to have brand new gates with e-bells on a heritage railway. It would be nice if they could get some old gate mechs from the LXRA (either WRRS or McK&H) and use them, and they could re-use the teardrops from the old crossings. That way they would be preserving some of the old equipment from crossings that were being removed, I think it would fit in nicely with the heritage status of the railway.
I had the same idea in mind too! The good news is that some of the already removed crossings had vintage gate mechs (I'm referring to the ones' at McKinnon [McK&H], Bentleigh [McK&H], and Blackburn [WRRS]). So the three crossings slated for upgrade could 'potentially' re-use them.

While I doubt the LXRA still have the signal masts from the McKinnon crossing, a similar looking setup at Pinnocks Road would work.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.910 ... 6656?hl=en

Put the signal with the sepearte gate mech mast one the side closest to the main road, and use the same gate mechs from McKinnon Road & the Teardrop bell off the old crossing, and you should be all set.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.931 ... 6656?hl=en

Heading back to McKinnon Road, this crossing still had a Teardrop bell in 2010.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.911 ... 6656?hl=en

The Bentleigh crossing had an interesting upgrade to the pedestrian crossings in 2006, following several incidents and fatalities with pedestrians and trains.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.918 ... 312!8i6656

The upgrade saw additional warning devices fitted. (According to Wikipedia's article on Bentleigh Train Station), Along with the common red pedestrian sign, an LED light box saying "Another Train Coming", which is lit when either an express train is bound on the southbound line, or when a train is expected after another train on the northbound line.
freebrickproductions wrote:I can also see them installing the gates on a separate mast, a la L&N, though the L&N did that as a standard new install rather than adding gates to pre-existing gateless signals. However, I have seen crossings where CSX kept at least one of the pre-existing gateless cantilever signals when they upgraded the crossing(s) to have gates. For example, at this crossing in Tullahoma, TN it appears that when CSX decided to install gates here, they kept the old gateless MI cantilevers that were here before the gates were installed, and just installed the gate mechanisms on short masts in front of them:
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.3610527 ... authuser=0
Actually, there's already a few examples of this in Victoria. The Beaconsfield crossing being an example. Flashing light signals were installed 1976, with the crossing upgraded with gates in 1986. One of the existing signals had a separate gate mech mast installed behind it.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-38.052 ... 312!8i6656
User avatar
TrickyMario7654
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by TrickyMario7654 »

Here's something you don't see everyday, a black & white gate replacing a red & white one! :Blink:

This picture (originally taken by James Hansen) shows the Donnybrook level in 2006, notice how it has two red & white wishbone gates?
Image

Here it is in Street view in 2007.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.542 ... 328!8i1664

Yes, that is a black & white gate! I wonder what happened? I presume that the previous gate was hit by a careless driver and they were out of red & white gates, but they still had an old black & white one lying around and used it instead.

Unfortunately, it was replaced by a newer 'flat' gate by 2013. :Awww:
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.542 ... 312!8i6656
User avatar
Username1
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:27 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by Username1 »

I just found out that some crossings in the US also have one of the bells turn off when the gates come down (although it seems rare compared to Australia).
Here's some videos

https://youtu.be/OH2VYKuU6Go

This crossings malfunctioning as well:
https://youtu.be/gy8iGMP1rGc
Metro, why are you so bad at maintaining your railway crossings??
User avatar
freebrickproductions
Posts: 9377
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by freebrickproductions »

Username1 wrote:I just found out that some crossings in the US also have one of the bells turn off when the gates come down (although it seems rare compared to Australia).
Here's some videos

https://youtu.be/OH2VYKuU6Go

This crossings malfunctioning as well:
https://youtu.be/gy8iGMP1rGc
I think it depends on what railroad owns/owned the line and how they like/liked to set-up the signals.
They/Them for me, please.

Click here if you want to submit crossing photos to the site!

Avatar by runesprite on Twitter.
User avatar
McK&H.Aust
Posts: 926
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:16 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by McK&H.Aust »

This was posted on ARTC's website today https://extranet.artc.com.au/docman/Doc ... 1603591583 It seems they are doing some kind of upgrade to the Bank St crossing at Avenel this week https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-36.892 ... 312!8i6656
I'm a bit confused about this, as the crossing already has fairly new looking gated signals. Does anyone know what work could be taking place? Hopefully they don't remove the hybrid bells.

Looks like they are cancelling some of the V/line passenger trains to do the work, I bet that will make the locals happy!

EDIT: After further research I think they may be installing a roundabout at the crossing, hopefully they will just move some of the existing signals.
User avatar
TrickyMario7654
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Australian Railroad Crossing Signals

Post by TrickyMario7654 »

McK&H.Aust wrote:This was posted on ARTC's website today https://extranet.artc.com.au/docman/Doc ... 1603591583 It seems they are doing some kind of upgrade to the Bank St crossing at Avenel this week https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-36.892 ... 312!8i6656
I'm a bit confused about this, as the crossing already has fairly new looking gated signals. Does anyone know what work could be taking place? Hopefully they don't remove the hybrid bells.

Looks like they are cancelling some of the V/line passenger trains to do the work, I bet that will make the locals happy!

EDIT: After further research I think they may be installing a roundabout at the crossing, hopefully they will just move some of he existing signals.
Hopefully they don't replace the hybrid bells. But anyways, I just drove through the Main Street crossing and I noticed a misprinted crossbuck on one of the signals (the one with the semaphorne pinnacle). The word "CROSSING" was not centered correctly, and it looks really odd. The hybrids bells also remain at this crossing, for the time being.
Post Reply