Page 55 of 86

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:41 pm
by brett nc railfanner

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:59 pm
by ToledoRailfan
And a cateye crossbuck with an inverted cateye "2 TRACKS" sign! Good thing that this crossing is a double crossing as that is probably the only reason that signal is still there! Nice find! Kind of odd that they replaced the intermediate signal for the abandoned line as the front lights are probably never going to operate. In fact I don't understand why they don't just convert that crossing(s) into a single crossing and add a second gate for the active crossing, but I guess the reason they don't is the same reason that a lot of abandon crossings still have their equipment and signage still maintained.

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:29 pm
by freebrickproductions
That was posted about before.

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 10:04 pm
by ZachL
freebrickproductions wrote:
That was posted about before.
And it's on "Andrews" road, too. :Laugh:

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:36 pm
by cabman701
ToledoRailfan wrote:
And a cateye crossbuck with an inverted cateye "2 TRACKS" sign! Good thing that this crossing is a double crossing as that is probably the only reason that signal is still there! Nice find! Kind of odd that they replaced the intermediate signal for the abandoned line as the front lights are probably never going to operate. In fact I don't understand why they don't just convert that crossing(s) into a single crossing and add a second gate for the active crossing, but I guess the reason they don't is the same reason that a lot of abandon crossings still have their equipment and signage still maintained.
Interesting that the back lights on this signal are pointed down the side road too.
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.4514093 ... 312!8i6656

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:38 pm
by ToledoRailfan

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:50 pm
by TrickyMario7654
ToledoRailfan wrote:Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bell only crossing too!

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:51 pm
by ToledoRailfan
TrickyMario7654 wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bell only crossing too!
Yep! I think that is the only bell only crossings I've come across with a teardrop bell!

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:46 pm
by freebrickproductions
ToledoRailfan wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bell only crossing too!
Yep! I think that is the only bell only crossings I've come across with a teardrop bell!
#1. It's been posted before.
#2. There's a bell-only Teardrop bell crossing in Iowa, and I think Illinois as well.

Re: Locations Of Currently Existing US&S TEARDROPS

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:50 pm
by ToledoRailfan
freebrickproductions wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:
TrickyMario7654 wrote:
ToledoRailfan wrote:Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bell only crossing too!
Yep! I think that is the only bell only crossings I've come across with a teardrop bell!
#1. It's been posted before.
#2. There's a bell-only Teardrop bell crossing in Iowa, and I think Illinois as well.
#1. Zach told me as I forgot.
#2. I wasn't aware of those.