Re: Crossings protected by traffic signals.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:37 pm
Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.rxrsignals.com/Phpbb3/
Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
I should've mentioned the spurToledoRailfan wrote:Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
I still wouldn't say that is appropriate for this thread as those traffic signals aren't there for the crossing. Whether or not a crossing like that is considered passive or not could be up for debate though. There is a similar situation at this crossing on a heritage line in Tecumseh, Michigan.NathanFromEngland wrote:I should've mentioned the spurToledoRailfan wrote:Wouldn't consider that a crossing as most of the Toronto Streetcar System is street-running and those lights are for an intersection.NathanFromEngland wrote:Toronto, Ontario.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.656384, ... 6656?hl=en
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6564221 ... 6656?hl=en
Those were not protected by traffic signals! The signals were for the intersection.LARDLOGO wrote:Out of service crossing in Vermont.
https://goo.gl/maps/w2soj8Tf8Rq
https://goo.gl/maps/4bx6Fw814dx
https://goo.gl/maps/U6qAWuErMGA2
Looks like those are just beacons and not full traffic signals.NathanFromEngland wrote:Prineville, Oregon (No longer there)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@44.30920 ... 328!8i1664