Okay I'm be honest here, I said that. I didn't expect him to respond.Username1 wrote:WHO DID THIS HAHA!!! SOMEONE IS STANDING UP FOR US!
https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsM ... 87437532:0
Of course, he said "nope". I'm still laughing though.
Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, PlyingKibbles89, Raco_GS, Hopen111, TommyBNSF
Okay I'm be honest here, I said that. I didn't expect him to respond.Username1 wrote:WHO DID THIS HAHA!!! SOMEONE IS STANDING UP FOR US!
https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsM ... 87437532:0
Another teardrop bell still in existence. that's the best news I've heard in a whileTrickyMario7654 wrote:While were on the subject of Teardrop bells, I just found out that there's another still in service on the Portland line.McK&H.Aust wrote:Nice work with the teardrop map! Are you only including teardrop bells which can be seen on GSV? Probably not a bad idea otherwise the map would be very cluttered![]()
Thanks for posting the information about the Safetran bells, it's nice to go back and see those classic crossings before they were trashed by Metro.
It's at Heathmere, on the Princes Highway.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-38.219 ... 328!8i1664
You can see the full details in the Teardrop locations thread.
I just recovered from that laugh attack over Daniel Andrews' post.McK&H.Aust wrote:Another teardrop bell still in existence. that's the best news I've heard in a whileTrickyMario7654 wrote:While were on the subject of Teardrop bells, I just found out that there's another still in service on the Portland line.McK&H.Aust wrote:Nice work with the teardrop map! Are you only including teardrop bells which can be seen on GSV? Probably not a bad idea otherwise the map would be very cluttered![]()
Thanks for posting the information about the Safetran bells, it's nice to go back and see those classic crossings before they were trashed by Metro.
It's at Heathmere, on the Princes Highway.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-38.219 ... 328!8i1664
You can see the full details in the Teardrop locations thread.![]()
So that's 2 teardrop bells confirmed on the Portland line, it's a good sign that there could be more. It's probably lucky that the line is in the hands of ARTC, otherwise those bells would be long gone by now. I would love to visit the area and see those crossings, if I get the time next year I could drive to Adelaide (via Swan Hill) to film a few crossings with GRS Lex-C lights, then come home the long way via Portland.
Very amusing, not much else Dan can say otherwise he's rubbishing his own government's policyUsername1 wrote:WHO DID THIS HAHA!!! SOMEONE IS STANDING UP FOR US!
https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsM ... 87437532:0
Oh my god that is hilarious! I can't believe that a crossing foamer actually messaged him! Instead of telling him that removing level crossings will do more harm then good, he just said that he is a crossing fan an doesn't want to see them go!Username1 wrote:WHO DID THIS HAHA!!! SOMEONE IS STANDING UP FOR US!
https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsM ... 87437532:0

Look at the comments on the post, it's an outrage!ToledoRailfan wrote:Oh my god that is hilarious! I can't believe that a crossing foamer actually messaged him! Instead of telling him that removing level crossings will do more harm then good, he just said that he is a crossing fan an doesn't want to see them go!Username1 wrote:WHO DID THIS HAHA!!! SOMEONE IS STANDING UP FOR US!
https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsM ... 87437532:0![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Sure they may hold up traffic, but asides from the tramsquare crossings, I don't think they slow down trains. A majority of deaths at active crossings are caused by people disobeying the warning systems. He ends with the usual spin.Daniel Andrews wrote: I'm afraid they don't work fine at all. They hold up traffic. They slow down trains. They're responsible for the deaths of our fellow Victorians. We're removing 50 of our most dangerous and congested level crossings. Absolutely no regrets.
I know right, some of them are actually quite mean as well... such as:TrickyMario7654 wrote:Look at the comments on the post, it's an outrage! :LOL3
I was having a good laugh over reading some of those comments, even though I was somewhat roasted.Username1 wrote:Tbh, I knew it was you that sent the email, didn't expect you to own up tho! I know I probably wouldn't have!
I know right, some of them are actually quite mean as well... such as:TrickyMario7654 wrote:Look at the comments on the post, it's an outrage! :LOL3
"Crossing fans? What, all two of them..."
Or "Can't marry a level crossing sweetie. Move on move on. Your heart will mend."
But there's also some funny ones such as:
"Let me build you a bridge, so you can get over it."![]()
Some people are also ranting about how Daniel Anders made this post up to support his agenda..
The saddest thing about the post though is that he got 1.2k likes (so far) while we (and especially you) got a roasting...![]()
On another note though, I stumbled across this video showing the upgraded crossing at Anstey station. It has Seimens gate mechs, and 1 General signals type 2 E-bell, and 1 General signals type 3 E-bell.
https://youtu.be/0jkGH1K6yMM
I don't think that's a Safetran...TrickyMario7654 wrote:McK&H.Aust wrote:TrickyMario7654 wrote: As for the newest installation of a Safetran bell, this crossing in Northcote actually had one installed between 2007-2009, replacing a hybrid bell!
2007: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.768 ... 328!8i1664
2009: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-37.768 ... 312!8i6656
Whatever it is, I think it may have came from Seaford road, as Seaford road had an unidentifiable black bell that mysteriously disappeared sometime between 2007-2009. The mysterious black bell was replaced by a hybrid bell, I also know that it couldn't have been a teardrop bell because the base matched a Safetran/WRRS/ whatever other bell looks like it, but the picture is so blurry you can't make out the shape of the rain shield.freebrickproductions wrote: I don't think that's a Safetran...
Looks more like a RACO or Griswold bell!