Another deep crossing
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:37 am
Looks dormant? Thats some dang good looking track there, for a branch or shortline. Scan on into town and see you'll some freshly re-paved crossing surfaces too.
Page 1 of 1
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:54 am
Looks dormant? Thats some dang good looking track there, for a branch or shortline. Scan on into town and see you'll some freshly re-paved crossing surfaces too.
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:50 pm
Is this some new kind of Virginia rail initiative... placing "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" signs on about every signalized crossing?
Give me good old "STOP ON RED SIGNAL" any day of the week.
DNSOT should be reserved for crossings in the area of an intersection with a queuing hazard, IMO.
Give me good old "STOP ON RED SIGNAL" any day of the week.
DNSOT should be reserved for crossings in the area of an intersection with a queuing hazard, IMO.
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Do Not Stop On Tracks is an Obama bailout sign that's posted everywhereSirKrunch wrote:Is this some new kind of Virginia rail initiative... placing "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" signs on about every signalized crossing?
Give me good old "STOP ON RED SIGNAL" any day of the week.
DNSOT should be reserved for crossings in the area of an intersection with a queuing hazard, IMO.
Damn thing is useless. Need to go back to common sense, stop on the tracks and get nailed by a train, OH WELL.
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:21 am
Speaking of rediculous, whats up with that stupid "1 Track" sign on top of the page?
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:52 am
Yo mamma made it,MD2020 wrote:Speaking of rediculous, whats up with that stupid "1 Track" sign on top of the page?
now everytime you say something about that damn sign or the new forum, my junk pile gets a little bit bigger
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:24 am
Mama said there was no use in a stupid "1 Track" sign, nor any requirement, so she didn't do it.
And I'll be sure to keep your maturity level in mind for the future, sir...
And I'll be sure to keep your maturity level in mind for the future, sir...
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 1:42 am
HAR HARMD2020 wrote:Mama said there was no use in a stupid "1 Track" sign, nor any requirement, so she didn't do it.
And I'll be sure to keep your maturity level in mind for the future, sir...
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:49 pm
Here's one in Utah.
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Center+St ... .05,,0,6.3
A couple of notes of interest... notice the signal on the right has an inverted crossing sign. Also, if you spin around 180 degrees, someone is painting the RXR sign in the street.
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Center+St ... .05,,0,6.3
A couple of notes of interest... notice the signal on the right has an inverted crossing sign. Also, if you spin around 180 degrees, someone is painting the RXR sign in the street.
Re: Another deep crossing
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:49 pm
I remember this one. I saw that about 6-9 months ago when I looked around there for fun. Quite unique for sure... I kind of wish that kind of sign can come back, but with the reflective rule on newer signs, I doubt that can ever be used ever again (at least for public crossings).