*STOP*
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:03 am
Yeah, I feel the same way, based on the map, the images was taken in July 2012 and he said that they're was in place in 2012, so the old signal must of been removed sometime between January to July 2012cabman701 wrote:I kind of got excited for a moment because the photographer mentioned in the caption that the old signals were still there in 2012. But it's not the crossing signals he was talking about.![]()
http://goo.gl/maps/LM88R
No. The photographer's caption was referring to the lineside block signals. The crossing signals were probably replaced years ago.TheSignalMan2000 wrote:Yeah, I feel the same way, based on the map, the images was taken in July 2012 and he said that they're was in place in 2012, so the old signal must of been removed sometime between January to July 2012cabman701 wrote:I kind of got excited for a moment because the photographer mentioned in the caption that the old signals were still there in 2012. But it's not the crossing signals he was talking about.![]()
http://goo.gl/maps/LM88R
AndyWS wrote:No. The photographer's caption was referring to the lineside block signals. The crossing signals were probably replaced years ago.TheSignalMan2000 wrote:Yeah, I feel the same way, based on the map, the images was taken in July 2012 and he said that they're was in place in 2012, so the old signal must of been removed sometime between January to July 2012cabman701 wrote:I kind of got excited for a moment because the photographer mentioned in the caption that the old signals were still there in 2012. But it's not the crossing signals he was talking about.![]()
http://goo.gl/maps/LM88R