So they planted a tree in front of the signal...

Talk about signals ranging from wigwags to EVA signals here.

Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, PlyingKibbles89, Raco_GS, Hopen111, TommyBNSF

Post Reply
User avatar
gedunk
Posts: 702
kuchnie-na-wymiar.wroclaw.pl
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:20 pm
Location: Santa Maria Ca
Contact:

So they planted a tree in front of the signal...

Post by gedunk »

The tree grew & blocked the lights (I guess). Rather than chop the tree, the lights were stuck out on an extension, and raised high up the mast.

Guess what? The little tree grew more. Cambridge MA

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Waltham+M ... 5,,1,-1.02
User avatar
cabman701
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:06 pm
Location: Largo, FL

Re: So they planted a tree in front of the signal...

Post by cabman701 »

I don't think it was done like that because of the tree. More so because of the building. It is the same way on the other side of the tracks.
User avatar
weatherdan882002
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Mechanicville, NY
Contact:

Re: So they planted a tree in front of the signal...

Post by weatherdan882002 »

Plus, there's cantilevers at the crossing, so I don't think there'll be any incidents related to people not seeing the flashing lights.
User avatar
SantaFebuff
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:29 pm
Location: Bourbonnais, IL

Re: So they planted a tree in front of the signal...

Post by SantaFebuff »

I agree, it appears that the signal has much more than a tree blocking the usual lights. We have a similar situation with a stop sign on a four-lane road here. There are utility poles lining the curb so for the flashing red light over the stop sign, they have it stuck out towards the road a bit to make it more visible.

On another note, the road next to the cantilever with the offset lights is Medford Street. Interestingly, it has a bit of a awkwardly positioned lights on the signal to the left, and a very faded pedestrian gate.

http://g.co/maps/2hscb

Cheers,
Joshua
Post Reply