BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Can't have signals without railroads, so talk about your favorite locomotives, railroads and any other (non signal) railroad related stuff.

Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, PlyingKibbles89, Raco_GS, Hopen111, TommyBNSF

User avatar
Trainmanalex2
Posts: 108
kuchnie-na-wymiar.wroclaw.pl
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:02 pm
Location: Carrollton TX
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by Trainmanalex2 »

TRAINMANKIGHT wrote:
mlgillson wrote:
TRAINMANKIGHT wrote:
Trainmanalex2 wrote:BNSF Repaired the bells so they work now do you see what I mean?
UMM OK
bnsf isnt the only one that fixes bells
the best class 1 in America Union Pacific does the same thing
safetran m-bells are VERY unreliable and frequently break down all you have to do is fix the contracts and clean the bell and it works again
Come visit UP's east-west mainline and Spine Line here in Iowa. You won't see any mechanical bells. UP replaced them with e-bells several years ago, even the ones that were in perfectly good condition.
well Union Pacific use wch e-bells much better than gs
but iam talking over all
up has WAY more m-bells than bnsf
me and trainmanalex2 are haveing ww3 over the best railroad and he thinks its bnsf when its up

No railroad is the best no railroads suck In reality they come together to form this perfect nation. In my opinion BNSF is the best and UP sucks. but they dont really suck in reality there helping build this country. To trainmankight: If you think any railroad sucks that isn't so all of them are doing good deeds and all of them have issues. I believe A railroad is a railroad. God bless this country and railfans and all railroads. :Smile:
User avatar
illinoistrains
Posts: 664
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Glendale, AZ
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by illinoistrains »

All railroads do dumb things once in a while. Thats what makes them comapnys, some railroads make more mistakes than others.
Visit my website to see my complete collection of over 2,200 train pictures:
http://cnfan1.rrpicturearchives.net/
bigphilliestyle2000
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Sacramento CA

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by bigphilliestyle2000 »

okay somebody help me understand, what makes one railroad better than the other? what are you basing your opinions on?

oh and the wch eballs do sound like garbage, though id put my vote in !
User avatar
luke
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by luke »

There is an area of BNSF's Chillicothe Subdivision that is still a haven for Safetran m-bells.

And BTW, good idea of BNSF to fix dead m-bells rather than waste money on new e-bells.
User avatar
owensri
Site Admin
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Matthews, NC

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by owensri »

bigphilliestyle2000 wrote:okay somebody help me understand, what makes one railroad better than the other? what are you basing your opinions on?

oh and the wch eballs do sound like garbage, though id put my vote in !
I'm basing my opinions on how railroads treat their employees...the way they run the trains and such. NS (aka Nazi Southern) seems to be the worst with employees...and I don't care for them mainly because of that A-hole David Goode (retired CEO) wanting to absorb Conrail...that did it for me with NS. He basically nagged them until they decided to let NS buy them up...what a crock.

CN...on the other hand...has really good shifts...treats their employees well...and everything seems to be kept up in good shape. I did like BN and SF...but that was when they were seperate... :2cents:
bigphilliestyle2000
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Sacramento CA

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by bigphilliestyle2000 »

okay i guess that would make sense. im sure everybody wants great shifts and happy employees! Is that all this is about?
User avatar
SirKrunch
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:09 am
Location: Story City, Iowa
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by SirKrunch »

mlgillson wrote:Come visit UP's east-west mainline and Spine Line here in Iowa. You won't see any mechanical bells. UP replaced them with e-bells several years ago, even the ones that were in perfectly good condition.
Actually, CNW started that trend before UP went full great guns doing that. The spine has quite a few ASC E-Bells on it, and a few of the county road crossings still have M-Bells yet as well. To be honest, looking at the crossings around this area... you will find most non-gated flashing light signals do not an E-bell yet... (Thankfully) But yeah, gated ones mainly have those God-awful sounding WCH eardrum bleeders.
Well, :Censored:
User avatar
illinoistrains
Posts: 664
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Glendale, AZ
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by illinoistrains »

BNSF has some m-bells along the Ennis Sub. here in phoenix: http://www.geocities.com/~aeromoe/Ennis.html
Visit my website to see my complete collection of over 2,200 train pictures:
http://cnfan1.rrpicturearchives.net/
User avatar
Smjh1979
Site Admin
Posts: 1770
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:33 pm
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by Smjh1979 »

Yep. BNSF has 10 mechanical bells on the Ennis sub, along with 6 more mechanical bells (that I know of) on other spur lines in Glendale. Those are the only 16 mechanical bells on BNSF that I know of that are left in Arizona.
User avatar
illinoistrains
Posts: 664
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Glendale, AZ
Contact:

Re: BNSF Kept there M-bells!

Post by illinoistrains »

I got so use to hearing m-bells this summer in Illinois that the e-bells here in Phoenix sound even worse then i remember!
Visit my website to see my complete collection of over 2,200 train pictures:
http://cnfan1.rrpicturearchives.net/
Post Reply