Hardly needed crossing signals
Moderators: freebrickproductions, mlgillson, PlyingKibbles89, Raco_GS, Hopen111, TommyBNSF
-
Robert_Gift
- No Longer Associated With The Forum
- Posts: 340
- kuchnie-na-wymiar.wroclaw.pl
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:44 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Hardly needed crossing signals
Expensive crossing signals for a siding which soon ended. How could they justify the cost?
I would have had only crossbucks.
Street view shows that only the signal cement foundations remain.
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k&ll= ... 01466&z=20
I would have had only crossbucks.
Street view shows that only the signal cement foundations remain.
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k&ll= ... 01466&z=20
I'm now self-employed but my boss is a moron.
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
The kind of signals needed at a crossing is determined by the type of road being cossed; number of lanes (with or without medians), and the amount of auto/truck traffic. Various Federal, State, and local ordinances come into play as well, with the local agency deciding on the signals. It generally pays the railroad (the ROW is private property) or its assigns to buy and install the gerar. The railroad has to pay for all future maintenance of the signals.
It's in the interest of the railroad NOT to inform the local agency of a pending abandonment - that's public info anyway - as it gets to keep the signals and related gear.
It's in the interest of the railroad NOT to inform the local agency of a pending abandonment - that's public info anyway - as it gets to keep the signals and related gear.
-
Robert_Gift
- No Longer Associated With The Forum
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:44 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
I would have placed only crossbucks there.gedunk wrote:The kind of signals needed at a crossing is determined by the type of road being cossed; number of lanes (with or without medians), and the amount of auto/truck traffic. Various Federal, State, and local ordinances come into play as well, with the local agency deciding on the signals. It generally pays the railroad (the ROW is private property) or its assigns to buy and install the gerar. The railroad has to pay for all future maintenance of the signals.
It's in the interest of the railroad NOT to inform the local agency of a pending abandonment - that's public info anyway - as it gets to keep the signals and related gear.
A switch engine can stop and flag.
I'm now self-employed but my boss is a moron.
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
That looks like a busy road, so I think the signals are justified. Of course, that must of been a busier line in the past, as it's now torn up.
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
Looks like this one that's still in service to the North and West. Notice how the line basically ends a couple thousand feet further West of the crossing.
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k&ll= ... 6,,0,-0.56
Looks like cantilevers sprout up around Phoenix faster than weeds in cow manure...
(Okay, that's obviously a reference only us farm boys are going to get.)
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=k&ll= ... 6,,0,-0.56
Looks like cantilevers sprout up around Phoenix faster than weeds in cow manure...
(Okay, that's obviously a reference only us farm boys are going to get.)
Well, 
-
Robert_Gift
- No Longer Associated With The Forum
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:44 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
Maybe the signals were placed because of the northbound street "T-ing" into the road right athe grade crossing.owensri wrote:That looks like a busy road, so I think the signals are justified. Of course, that must of been a busier line in the past, as it's now torn up.
The track looks like it soon ended. No sign of it continuing to other businesses.
I'm now self-employed but my boss is a moron.
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
- TrainmanKight
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:17 pm
- Location: St Louis, Mo and every where else under the sun.
- Contact:
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
when you work on a switch job the LAST thing you want to do is flag a xingRobert_Gift wrote:I would have placed only crossbucks there.gedunk wrote:The kind of signals needed at a crossing is determined by the type of road being cossed; number of lanes (with or without medians), and the amount of auto/truck traffic. Various Federal, State, and local ordinances come into play as well, with the local agency deciding on the signals. It generally pays the railroad (the ROW is private property) or its assigns to buy and install the gerar. The railroad has to pay for all future maintenance of the signals.
It's in the interest of the railroad NOT to inform the local agency of a pending abandonment - that's public info anyway - as it gets to keep the signals and related gear.
A switch engine can stop and flag.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin
People who need a foot up their Ass affect the lives of many. There is still no cure for someone who needs a foot up their Ass, except a foot up their Ass
I speak my mind, if you don't like that oh well. I'll have you fill out a hurt feelings report and submit that to my office.
Be Sure To See My YouTube Account http://www.youtube.com/user/TrainmanKight
People who need a foot up their Ass affect the lives of many. There is still no cure for someone who needs a foot up their Ass, except a foot up their Ass
I speak my mind, if you don't like that oh well. I'll have you fill out a hurt feelings report and submit that to my office.
Be Sure To See My YouTube Account http://www.youtube.com/user/TrainmanKight
-
Robert_Gift
- No Longer Associated With The Forum
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:44 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Re: Hardly needed crossing signals
It's not like there is a switch nearby which complicates things.TRAINMANKIGHT wrote:when you work on a switch job the LAST thing you want to do is flag a xingRobert_Gift wrote:I would have placed only crossbucks there.gedunk wrote:The kind of signals needed at a crossing is determined by the type of road being cossed; number of lanes (with or without medians), and the amount of auto/truck traffic. Various Federal, State, and local ordinances come into play as well, with the local agency deciding on the signals. It generally pays the railroad (the ROW is private property) or its assigns to buy and install the gerar. The railroad has to pay for all future maintenance of the signals.
It's in the interest of the railroad NOT to inform the local agency of a pending abandonment - that's public info anyway - as it gets to keep the signals and related gear.
A switch engine can stop and flag.
Plus, they likely have two-way radios which makes switching even easier.
Just a straight track which soon ends.
They must be rich.
I'm now self-employed but my boss is a moron.
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!
My life is an open book. Unfortunately, I'm illiterate.
My patients' arrhythmias straighten themselves out!!